top of page
Search

The Bar and Jim Garrison

  • Writer: Fred Litwin
    Fred Litwin
  • Oct 9
  • 1 min read

Updated: Oct 10

ree

Indeed, Garrison even told the press that he could ignore Judge Haggerty's guidelines on pre-trial publicity:

New Orleans Times-Picayune, March 30, 1967
New Orleans Times-Picayune, March 30, 1967

Money Quote:

The DA, after Robertson had left, was asked about a statement that he, as district attorney, was not bound by guidelines set by Judge Haggerty as an attempt to prevent pre-judicial publicity concerning Shaw's trial.
Garrison said it was his opinion that "the judge was just making a suggestion when he handed out the guidelines. The District Attorney can make any statements he wishes."

In late March, Haggerty told the press that he was going to revisit some of the publicity guidelines from the preliminary hearing:

New Orleans States=Item, March 24, 1967
New Orleans States=Item, March 24, 1967

Here is what Haggerty said on the guidelines for pretrial publicity:

New Orleans Times-Picayune, March 28, 1967
New Orleans Times-Picayune, March 28, 1967

Haggerty was not happy in June, 1967:

Miami Herald, June 23, 1967
Miami Herald, June 23, 1967

The issue really came to head in early 1968 with the publication of an article by Jerrold Footlick. Garrison told Footlick that "there is no way that Clay Shaw can get an acquittal."


Shaw's attorney's filed a motion for change of venue which was denied by Judge Haggerty. You can read the motion in the Footlick blog post linked above.


Previous Relevant Blog Posts


There was no discovery in Louisiana courts in the 1960s.


A good selection of material on pre-trial publicity and the problems facing Shaw's defense attorneys.


Shaw's attorneys faced a daunting challenge in dealing with potential witnesses.

Post: Blog2_Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

©2020 by On The Trail of Delusion. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page