Was Fletcher Prouty an Antisemite? Part Three

Updated: Apr 29, 2023

For those of you who missed the first two parts, here are the relevant links:

A look at Prouty's association with the Liberty Lobby.

Was Fletcher Prouty an Antisemite? Part Two

A Fletcher Prouty letter has some explicit antisemitism.

The Journal of Historical Review was an antisemitic publication of The Institute for Historical Review which focused on holocaust denial.

You can read a collection of issues here.

Here is the cover of an issue from Spring, 1990.

Here is the back cover:

That's quite the lineup. David Irving, a controversial historian who has questioned Hitler's role in the Holocaust and is prone to making antisemitic statements. Robert Faurisson wrote a letter to Yad Vashem in 1974 telling that that there had been no Holocaust. You can read about Doug Collins here. You can read about Mark Weber here.

Prouty wrote a letter to the Journal of Historical Review in 1992:

Primary goals? The primary goal of the Institute was Holocaust denial.

The IHR also published books:

Including:

Fletcher Prouty was an antisemite.

Previous Relevant Blog Posts on Fletcher Prouty

Jeremy Gunn on Oliver Stone, Jim Garrison, and Fletcher Prouty

Jeremy Gunn tells an audience that Fletcher Prouty was totally unreliable.

Was Marina Oswald Involved in the JFK Assassination?

Fletcher Prouty actually claimed that Marina Oswald was in on the plot.

James DiEugenio's Lame Excuses for Fletcher Prouty

Mr. DiEugenio can't explain why Fletcher Prouty did such a poor job of testifying before the ARRB.