Search
  • Fred Litwin

Did Delphine Roberts See Lee Harvey Oswald in Banister's Office? (Part Two)

Please check out Part One of "Did Delphine Roberts See Lee Harvey Oswald in Banister's Office?"


Mary Brengel worked for Guy Banister for a short period in 1963. In May 1967, she wrote Jim Garrison a letter offering to be interviewed about her knowledge of what went on in Banister's office. Here is her letter to Jim Garrison:

Here is my transcription (please help fill in the blanks):


Dear Mr. Garrison:
I am aware from the publication in the newspapers of his picture, with an arrow pointing to his office door, that Guy Banister may possibly figure somewhere in the case you are building.
I worked in his office from the latter part of October until about the 10th of December, 1963, during which occurred several rather strange or unexplained (to me) things (however not associated with Cubans). If you feel that anything I might tell you could help to throw - [ , , ,] light on missing details, I would appreciate talking with you confidentially - though naturally I would like to stay out of "the limelight."
Mrs. Delphine Roberts worked much more closely with and a great deal longer for Mr. Banister than I - so if you are in contact with her and if she is speaking freely about the incidents that bring questions to my mind - then I could add nothing. I do question that she would speak freely and if she may have omitted mentioning any persons I might mention, I surely would not want her to know I offered information until after you had my information.
Is there a question about whether Mr. Banister's death in June 1964 was from natural causes? I do question this as well as the roles of others in connection therewith.

My transcription:

I am employed by Mathews, Bergman, Farrah + Associates Architects, as Office Manager and secretary to Mr. Mathews and can be reached at their office at 929 Howard Avenue - Third Floor - during working hours, Mon. thru Friday. Two office phone number are shown below.
There is, in fact, a small conference room in my office which might serve well for a short confidential talk.
Please understand I am convinced after Channel 4's presentation last night that you are seeking the truth and are - even though you know the truth -- being blocked on various details. I would hate to furnish information against anyone I consider a conservative particularly Mr. Banister, but as you, too, seem to feel the American people (and the world) deserve the truth about Kennedy's assassination, regardless of where that truth lies.
Only you can assess whether the facts I could provide are meaningful or are merely trivia which would naturally raise questions in the mind of a person doing temporary work for a private investigator.
Please let me know if I may be of assistance - preferably, of course, on a confidential basis.

Ms. Brengel clearly wanted to tell her story - she seemed very anxious to help the Garrison investigation. And so she met with two Garrison investigators at her home:

Note that she did not say one word about Lee Harvey Oswald - just like Delphine Roberts. Brengel's main suspicion was that Delphine Roberts might have had foreknowledge of Guy Banister's death.


How do the conspiracy books treat Brengel? James DiEugenio writes in Destiny Betrayed:


DiEugenio's source is Brengel's interview with the HSCA. I don't have that interview, but I do have her submission to the ARRB.

Now, her statement to the ARRB does confirm what DiEugenio writes in Destiny Betrayed. But notice the difference between her initial statement to Garrison and her later statement to the ARRB. First, she says that Roberts got a phone call that Kennedy had been assassinated and that she should turn on the TV. It's not unusual for a detective agency to have a television in the office. In her second statement, Roberts brings a "pocket radio" to work on the day of the assassination, and then receives a phone call. There is no mystery of suspicion in her first statement. In her ARRB statement, she suspects Delphine Roberts of having advance knowledge of the JFK assassination and she also suspects that Banister might be part of it.


Her only suspicions in her Garrison statement was that Delphine Roberts might have advance knowledge of Banister's death.


And she makes no mention of Lee Harvey Oswald.


The other DiEugenio claim is about Oswald:

This is true, although like Roberts, Brengel didn't say one word about Oswald in her interview with Garrison. Here is part of the transcript from the PBS Frontline documentary on Lee Harvey Oswald:


MARY BRENGEL, Banister's Secretary : It's when the news accounts from Dallas were showing Oswald that Delphine said to me, "Well, you know, he was in this office. You saw him." And I told her that not to my knowledge. I didn't know that I had seen him. To me, he would have been just another face in the crowd. And she was just calling my attention to the news in Dallas, that this man had been in our office.

It's interesting that Delphine Roberts tells Mary Brengel that "you saw him." Of course

that was impossible since Brengel only started work in October 1963, well after Oswald had moved away from New Orleans. The HSCA Final Report says that Brengel started work in June, which if true, is interesting because she never saw Oswald in Banister's office.


And here is Brengel's account from a 1979 interview which I found in the files of Gus Russo at Baylor University. Now, Oswald is left out totally and it's just David Ferrie that Roberts tells her she had seen:

Both Delphine Roberts and Mary Brengel are just not believable witnesses.



97 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All